Posted in

The rule that PIF may have comfortably breached at Newcastle as potential punishment emerges

Returning to the UEFA Champions League is a moment of immense pride and excitement for everyone connected with Newcastle United.

It represents a return to the very top of European football and is a reward for the incredible progress the club has made.

However, this return to the elite stage also brings with it a much higher level of scrutiny, particularly when it comes to the complex world of financial regulations.

While the focus is on the pitch, there are growing reports that the club could be facing a challenge from UEFA officials behind the scenes.

For a long time, the main financial concern for the club was meeting the Premier League’s Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR).

These rules had significantly limited the club’s ability to spend in the transfer market over the previous year.

Thankfully, the combination of qualifying for the Champions League and the major sale of Alexander Isak to Liverpool largely solved those domestic issues.

This financial breathing room allowed manager Eddie Howe to finally be active in the market again, bringing in several key players to strengthen the squad for the challenges ahead.

The signings of Nick Woltemade, Yoane Wissa, Anthony Elanga, Malick Thiaw, and Jacob Ramsey were all made with the intention of building a team capable of competing on all fronts.

The arrival of Woltemade, in particular, was a huge relief after a long search for a new striker. He made a dream start by scoring on his debut, immediately beginning to justify the club’s investment in him.

A football finance expert compared the sale of Isak to the situation when Aston Villa sold Jack Grealish to Manchester City a few years ago.

That sale gave Villa the financial flexibility to rebuild their squad, and the hope is that the Isak money will do the same for Newcastle, preventing the club from facing another period where they are unable to sign players.

However, just as one problem seems to be solved, another may be appearing. While the club may now be in a healthier position with the Premier League’s rules, they must also comply with UEFA’s own separate financial regulations.

These rules are strict and are designed to ensure that clubs live within their means. According to reports from major publications, Newcastle United has comfortably breached UEFA’s permitted loss limit.

The rule states that a club cannot lose more than £52 million over a rolling three-year period. The problem for Newcastle is that the operating losses recorded at the club for the last two seasons were significantly higher than that limit, sitting at around £68 million for each year.

This immediately puts the club in a difficult position, even before the figures for the most recent season are fully calculated.

The situation is made more complicated by how UEFA views certain transfer transactions. For example, the sale of academy product Elliot Anderson to Nottingham Forest was officially recorded alongside the purchase of goalkeeper Odysseas Vlachodimos.

UEFA’s financial regulators are treating this as a swap deal rather than two separate transactions, which changes the financial value they assign to it.

In an even bigger blow, the sale of Allan Saint-Maximin to the Saudi club Al Ahli has had its profit reduced to zero.

This is because UEFA considers the Saudi club to be a related party to Newcastle United due to the shared ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF).

These interpretations significantly reduce the income Newcastle can claim from player sales in UEFA’s eyes, making it much harder for the club to balance its books according to the European governing body’s rules.

The official financial reports for the last year have not yet been released, but the early signs suggest that Newcastle could be facing a punishment similar to the fines recently given to other Premier League clubs like Aston Villa and Chelsea.

For the owners and the fans, the hope is that the major player sales this summer represent a turning point.

The strategy is to become a club that is sustainable and consistently competes at the highest level. But for now, it seems that the financial hangover from the initial period of investment may result in one more difficult conversation with UEFA, a reminder that success on the pitch must be built on a stable foundation off it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *