Promises were borken as Newcastle insiders reveal what Isak is talking about – journalist

Alexander Isak has finally broken his silence about his Newcastle United future, and his words have caused a storm around St James’ Park.

The Swedish striker admitted that trust between himself and the club has been damaged, and he believes promises made to him were broken. For Isak, the best solution now is to move on, but Newcastle insist they have no plans to let him leave this summer.

Up until Tuesday night, Isak had kept quiet despite weeks of speculation linking him with a transfer. Fans, reporters, and pundits had all given their views, but the player himself had said nothing publicly.

That changed when he released a statement on social media, claiming that the club had not honoured agreements and suggesting that the relationship could not continue.

It was a rare moment of honesty from a player usually known for his calm personality, and it immediately forced Newcastle to respond.

The club’s reply was swift and direct. In their statement, Newcastle made it clear that no promises were broken because no such commitments were ever made.

Read Also  Gary Neville says Newcastle United player will be 'disappointed' with his performance vs Arsenal

They said Isak remains an important player under contract and that they fully expect him to be reintegrated into the squad once he is ready. Most importantly, the club stated they do not see a sale happening this summer, effectively shutting the door on any immediate exit.

This has left many wondering what Isak was referring to when he spoke about broken promises. According to reports, the situation may stem from contract discussions earlier in the year.

Insiders believe Isak was expecting an improved deal, one that former director Amanda Staveley had raised in early 2024. At the time, Staveley is thought to have given Isak some assurance that a new and more lucrative contract would be arranged.

However, the picture changed quickly when Paul Mitchell arrived as Newcastle’s sporting director in the summer. Within a week of his appointment, Staveley and her husband, Mehrdad Ghodoussi, sold their shares in the club and walked away.

Once they left, Mitchell reviewed the situation and decided that a fresh deal for Isak was not a priority. His reasoning was simple: Isak was already tied to a long-term contract that runs until 2028, and he was already among the club’s highest earners.

Read Also  4 free agents Newcastle can still sign after transfer deadline

At a time when Newcastle were facing restrictions under Profit and Sustainability Rules, Mitchell felt there was no need to stretch the wage bill further.

For Isak, this was a sharp change in direction. He believed he had been promised improved terms, only to see that pledge withdrawn when new leadership came in.

The player’s camp reportedly hoped the issue could be revisited this summer, but when negotiations did open, Newcastle officials were left stunned by his demands.

Isak is said to have asked for £300,000 a week, a figure that would place him on a completely different level from the rest of the squad. For a club already under financial pressure, that request was simply too high.

Now, both sides are in a standoff. Isak feels let down, pointing to what he sees as broken promises and a lack of trust. Newcastle, meanwhile, argue that they have acted fairly and responsibly, protecting the long-term stability of the club.

Read Also  Fabrizio Romano says Newcastle have made contact to sign ‘world class’ PSG attacker

Their statement made it clear they still see him as part of the family and that he will be welcomed back into the team if he chooses to return.

The big question is what happens next. For now, Newcastle are holding firm, refusing to sell one of their best players despite outside interest. Liverpool and other top clubs are watching closely, but Newcastle’s stance is that Isak is not for sale this summer.

For the player, it may mean swallowing his frustration and rejoining the team, at least until the situation can be revisited further down the line.

Whatever happens, this episode has highlighted the fragile nature of trust between players and clubs. Promises, even if informal, can create expectations that later become problems when leadership changes or finances shift.

Isak’s case is a reminder that football is not just about performances on the pitch but also about relationships, trust, and timing. Newcastle are standing firm, but whether that will be enough to repair the damage with their star striker remains to be seen.