Newcastle United’s nightmare turns into reality as PIF accidentally fund deal for Eddie Howe target

The cruel irony of Newcastle United’s transfer window has reached new heights as their Saudi owners’ global investments inadvertently finance the very clubs blocking Eddie Howe’s recruitment plans.

While the Magpies remain paralyzed by Premier League spending rules, their parent company PIF’s involvement in the Club World Cup pours millions into the coffers of direct rivals Chelsea and Manchester City – including funds now being used to hijack Newcastle’s top targets.

This financial absurdity plays out in real time as Chelsea prepare to complete a £50 million deal for Joao Pedro, the Brighton forward who sat atop Howe’s wishlist.

The Blues’ ability to outspend Newcastle stems partly from their Club World Cup windfall – journalist Ben Jacobs reports they’ve already secured £40 million in tournament prize money, with £55 million possible if they defeat Palmeiras.

These funds flow from a £750 million DAZN broadcasting deal that PIF helped facilitate through their investment in the streaming platform, creating a perverse situation where Newcastle’s owners effectively subsidize their own competitive disadvantages.

Finance expert Adam Williams lays bare the consequences: “They are effectively funding several of the club’s rivals. If Chelsea win the tournament, they’ll get almost £100 million – money that strengthens one of Newcastle’s direct competitors.”

The pattern repeats with Liam Delap’s recent choice of Chelsea over Newcastle, showcasing how PIF’s global sports strategy sometimes works at cross-purposes with their Premier League project.

The contrast between clubs couldn’t be starker. While Chelsea leverage PIF-connected tournament earnings to circumvent financial constraints, Newcastle’s hands remain tied by Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) despite their owners’ £700 billion wealth.

The Magpies’ only summer progress – a belated move for goalkeeper James Trafford – highlights the frustrating limitations of their position. Even this deal reeks of financial constraints, coming two years after Howe first identified Trafford as a target.

This paradox underscores Newcastle’s uncomfortable truth within PIF’s portfolio. As Williams notes, “The club is an important cog in the machine, but not the top priority.”

Their owners’ broader sports investments – from LIV Golf to Formula 1 – sometimes create unintended consequences for the St James’ Park project. The Club World Cup partnership exemplifies this tension, delivering short-term gains to established elites while Newcastle navigate PSR restrictions.

As the transfer window progresses, Newcastle must find creative solutions to this imbalance. Their inability to capitalize on PIF’s financial might while rivals benefit from the group’s peripheral investments creates a unique competitive disadvantage.

Until regulatory changes or strategic shifts occur, the Magpies risk becoming victims of their owners’ success in other ventures – a nightmare scenario for fans who dreamed of unlimited Saudi-backed spending transforming their club’s fortunes overnight.