Newcastle United face skyrocketing £87m transfer bill as PSR plot could now backfire
Newcastle United’s aggressive transfer strategy, particularly their use of player swap deals, could backfire as their £87 million transfer bill continues to climb.
Under the ownership of the Saudi Public Investment Fund, the Magpies have spent heavily in recent transfer windows, but the Premier League’s Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) have put them in a difficult position.
The Premier League’s PSR, previously known as Financial Fair Play (FFP), limits clubs to a maximum allowable loss of £105 million over a three-year period.
As the assessment window approaches its deadline on June 30th, Newcastle United appears to be urgently maneuvering to stay within these limits.
To manage their financial standings, Newcastle and other clubs have resorted to quasi-swap deals.
These transactions involve exchanging two players for approximately equivalent fees in separate deals, allowing both clubs to improve their PSR positions immediately.
The incoming transfer fees are recorded immediately, while the outgoing fees are amortized over the new player’s contract length.
One such deal involved Everton’s Dominic Calvert-Lewin potentially joining Newcastle, with Newcastle’s Yankuba Minteh moving to Everton.
Another reported deal involved Wolves defender Max Kilman joining Newcastle, with Newcastle academy product Elliot Anderson heading to Wolves.
Due to the PSR rules governing homegrown players, any fee received for Anderson would be recorded as ‘pure profit’, rather than being offset against the player’s book value.
While these quasi-swap deals are within legal boundaries, they have sparked controversy. BBC Sport reported that at least one Premier League club has raised concerns about these accounting practices with the league.
In response, the Premier League is considering forming a working group to address this loophole, though any reforms would require the approval of two-thirds of the clubs and would not be implemented before the current PSR deadline.
While these deals may provide short-term relief, they do not offer a permanent solution to Newcastle’s financial challenges.
The Magpies’ amortization charges, which spread the transfer fees over the length of a player’s contract, reached £87 million in the 2022-23 season. This figure is expected to rise in the 2023-24 accounts, adding further pressure.
Any new player acquired through a quasi-swap deal would immediately impact Newcastle’s PSR headroom when the new assessment window begins on July 1st.
Although the club aims to meet the £105 million threshold by June 30th to avoid immediate sanctions, this strategy may only defer their financial issues.
Newcastle United’s reliance on quasi-swap deals highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls of managing football club finances under stringent regulatory frameworks.
While these strategies may offer temporary relief, sustainable financial management and compliance with PSR regulations will be crucial for the club’s long-term success.
As the Premier League considers closing these loopholes, clubs like Newcastle must adapt to ensure their strategies align with both the letter and the spirit of the rules.
Read Also: Revealed: Newcastle would accept £20M offer for 26yr old
Read Also: Big Newcastle United transfer decision imminent as Magpies assemble emergency recruitment team
