Posted in

Former top referee rules on this controversial Newcastle v Wolves incident

Newcastle United finally got their Premier League season up and running with a narrow but vital 1-0 victory over Wolverhampton Wanderers this past weekend.

The winning moment belonged to debutant Nick Woltemade, whose first-half header sent the St James’ Park crowd into raptures and secured three precious points.

In matches that are decided by such a fine margin, every single moment takes on a greater significance. Often, the conversation after the final whistle isn’t just about the goal that was scored, but also about the key incidents that might have changed the game entirely.

One such moment occurred not long before Woltemade’s winner, and it has since become a major talking point among fans and pundits.

It began with a moment of real quality from defender Dan Burn, who launched a beautiful, looping diagonal pass over the top of the Wolves defensive line.

The ball was perfectly weighted for the run of winger Harvey Barnes, setting up a thrilling footrace between him and Wolves defender Yerson Mosquera.

What happened next was a testament to Barnes’s intelligence. He read the bounce of the ball perfectly, while Mosquera misjudged it completely.

NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, ENGLAND – AUGUST 27: A statue of Bobby Robson is seen outside the stadium prior to the Premier League match between Newcastle United and Liverpool FC at St. James Park on August 27, 2023 in Newcastle upon Tyne, England. (Photo by James Gill – Danehouse/Getty Images)

The ball skipped past the defender and landed invitingly for Barnes to run onto, right on the edge of the penalty area. With the Wolves goalkeeper rooted to his line, Barnes was through on goal with a golden opportunity to score. But he never got to take the shot.

Realizing he had been beaten, Mosquera made no attempt to play the ball. Instead, he cynically took down the Newcastle player, throwing an elbow that made contact with Barnes’s head.

From the stands, it looked like a clear and obvious foul. The expectation was that referee Chris Kavanagh would immediately produce a red card.

The defender was the last man, and he had deliberately denied a clear goal-scoring opportunity—a textbook case for a dismissal.

However, play was allowed to continue. A short time later, the game was stopped, and the announcement was made that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) was checking the incident.

For many fans in the stadium, this was a reassurance; surely technology would correct this apparent mistake. But within mere seconds, the check was over, and play resumed without any action taken.

The disbelief around the stadium was palpable. It seemed an inexplicable decision.

This confusion was only compounded for those who later watched television replays, which clearly showed the nature of the foul.

The question on everyone’s mind was how both the on-field referee and the official in the VAR room could have seen nothing wrong with the challenge.

LEEDS, ENGLAND – AUGUST 30: Jason Tindall, Assistant manager of Newcastle United and Eddie Howe, Manager of Newcastle United on the side line during the Premier League match between Leeds United and Newcastle United at Elland Road on August 30, 2025 in Leeds, England. (Photo by Richard Sellers/Sportsphoto/Allstar via Getty Images)

This is where the opinion of an expert becomes very valuable. Keith Hackett, a former top FIFA referee and former head of the Premier League’s refereeing body, did not mince his words when asked for his analysis.

He stated plainly that it was a “clear red card offence.” He explained that it was a clear foul that also fulfilled the criteria for Denying an Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity (DOGSO), which mandates a red card.

He called it an “easy decision” and expressed frustration with the VAR system, particularly noting that the official on VAR duty for this match, Timothy Wood, was experiencing his first-ever game in that role in the Premier League.

Hackett’s implication was that an inexperienced official may have been reluctant to overrule the more experienced on-field referee.

Thankfully for Newcastle, the decision did not ultimately cost them the points. But the incident raises broader questions about consistency and accountability in officiating.

Many fans felt that had a similar incident involved a more high-profile club, the media fallout would have been immense and continuous.

Instead, the moment was largely glossed over on major highlight shows, which chose not to analyze the controversial decision at all.

Newcastle manager Eddie Howe, known for his respectful and measured approach, did not use the incident as an excuse, instead focusing on his team’s positive performance.

His restraint, while admirable, left many supporters feeling that their club’s grievances are sometimes overlooked in the wider football conversation.

While the three points are all that truly matter in the league table, this incident serves as another reminder of the fine margins in football and the ongoing debates surrounding the use of VAR.

For now, Newcastle can celebrate a hard-fought win and look ahead to a monumental Champions League night against Barcelona, hoping that the focus will be solely on the football.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *