Actually, maybe Alexander Isak should have been sent off

Watching live football often means enduring commentary that can range from insightful to downright frustrating. While many viewers might tune out the voices accompanying the action, there are rare combinations that add value to the experience.

Ally McCoist and Darren Fletcher are among the few who genuinely enhance a match, with McCoist’s candid observations and Fletcher’s perceptive analysis making them a standout duo.

McCoist, despite his past association with Sunderland, brings authenticity and relatability, while Fletcher avoids the over-scripted tendencies of some commentators, offering genuine insights that resonate with fans.

However, the commentary during Newcastle United’s 3-1 victory over Southampton on January 25 was far from exemplary. The broadcast, courtesy of Peacock, featured Efan Ekoku and Jonathan Beck, whose biased and often baffling takes left many viewers, including myself, incredulous.

Their analysis of key moments, particularly the penalty incident involving Alexander Isak, showcased a glaring disconnect from reality. Isak, sprinting towards goal, was clearly tripped by Joe Aribo, who planted his foot directly in front of the Newcastle striker and missed the ball entirely. Referee Sam Barrott initially awarded a corner, but after reviewing the incident via VAR, correctly overturned his decision and pointed to the spot.

Ekoku’s dismissal of the foul as a “clash of legs” and Beck’s musings on “who initiated the contact” revealed a lack of understanding of the rules and the dynamics of the situation. Their incredulity continued even after the penalty was awarded, with Ekoku claiming Newcastle had been “gifted” the decision. Such commentary not only frustrates viewers but undermines the credibility of the analysis.

Southampton manager Ivan Juric, perhaps in an attempt to deflect attention from his team’s struggles, echoed similar sentiments post-match. He argued that the incident should have been a foul against Isak, an assertion as puzzling as it was unfounded. Juric’s comments, combined with Southampton’s dire form, suggest a manager under significant pressure, desperate to shift the narrative away from his side’s defensive shortcomings and likely relegation. While his frustrations are understandable, his attempts to rewrite the events of the match do little to inspire confidence in his leadership.

Despite the controversial commentary and Juric’s protestations, the match itself was a testament to Newcastle’s resilience and quality. Falling behind to a Jan Bednarek header early on, the Magpies responded with determination. Isak’s converted penalty and subsequent goal turned the tide, and Sandro Tonali’s second-half strike sealed the win. Newcastle’s ability to recover from setbacks and capitalize on their opportunities reflects the progress they have made under Eddie Howe.

The statistics further highlight Newcastle’s dominance. With 17 total shots compared to Southampton’s 12 and nine on target to the hosts’ five, the Magpies clearly posed the greater threat. Their superior touches in the box (34 to Southampton’s 15) and corner count (8 to 3) underline their attacking intent. While Southampton enjoyed a slight edge in possession, Newcastle’s efficiency and decisiveness in key moments proved decisive.

VAR, often a contentious topic, played a crucial role in ensuring justice during the match. In addition to confirming the penalty, it correctly ruled out a potential Southampton goal for offside. While the system is not without flaws, its interventions in this game highlighted its importance in delivering fair outcomes.

Newcastle’s victory keeps them firmly in contention for a Champions League spot and builds momentum ahead of a busy schedule. Upcoming fixtures against Fulham, Arsenal, and Birmingham offer opportunities to strengthen their position in the league and progress in domestic competitions. With a squad brimming with talent and confidence, Newcastle appears well-equipped to navigate the challenges ahead.

The commentary debacle serves as a reminder of the influence broadcasters wield in shaping perceptions of the game. While insightful analysis can elevate the viewing experience, biased or ill-informed remarks detract from the enjoyment and understanding of the sport. Fans deserve commentators who respect their intelligence and provide meaningful contributions, rather than pandering to controversy or personal agendas.

Newcastle’s performance, however, speaks for itself. The team’s determination, tactical discipline, and attacking prowess continue to make them a force to be reckoned with. As the season unfolds, they have every chance of achieving their ambitions, guided by a clear vision and unwavering support from their passionate fanbase. For those who doubted the penalty or Newcastle’s legitimacy as a top contender, the evidence is clear: this is a team on the rise, undeterred by noise and focused on success.